T The concurrence of criminal acts occurs when a person commits several types of criminal offenses. as reflected in the case decided by the district court of statbat number 4/pid.b/2022/pn.stb, the defendant, muliyadi, committed the crime of receiving stolen goods jointly and continuously involving oil palm fruits within the period from july 2021 to october 2021. the issues raised in this thesis are: (1) what is the legal basis for the judge in applying article 480 paragraph (1) in conjunction with article 65 paragraph (1) of the indonesian criminal code (kuhp) to the perpetrator of the crime of receiving stolen oil palm fruits (study of decision number: 4/pid.b/2022/pn.stb); and (2) how is the form of concurrence in the crime of receiving stolen oil palm fruits as reflected in the said decision.the type of research used is normative legal research with a descriptive-analytical approach, utilizing secondary data obtained through literature study. the analysis is conducted qualitatively, with conclusions drawn using deductive reasoning. the results of the analysis indicate that the form of concurrence in this case constitutes a continuing offense (voortgezette handeling). furthermore, the judge’s basis in applying article 480 paragraph (1) in conjunction with article 65 paragraph (1) of the kuhp has fulfilled the elements of the crime of receiving stolen goods; however, the application of the provision is considered inappropriate, as it should have referred to article 64 of the kuhp. therefore, greater caution is required from the panel of judges to ensure careful consideration in applying the relevant legal provisions, as such application determines the sanctions imposed and helps avoid errors in judicial decisions.