Perancangan tata letak berkelanjutan fasilitas pengolahan sampah plastik terintegrasi
Info Katalog
File Repositori
Subyek : Refuse disposal facilities
Penerbit : FTI - Usakti
Kota Terbit : Jakarta
Tahun Terbit : 2025
Pembimbing 1 : Winnie Septiani
Pembimbing 2 : Emelia Sari
Kata Kunci : SSLP; Eckenrode; ELECTRE; Sustainable Layout Design
Status Posting : Published
Status : Lengkap
File Repositori
| No. | Nama File | Hal. | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Halaman-Judul.pdf | 11 | |
| 2. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Surat-Pernyataan-Revisi-Terakhir.pdf | 1 | |
| 3. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Surat-Hasil-Similaritas.pdf | 2 | |
| 4. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Halaman-Pernyataan-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Tugas-Akhir-untuk-Kepentingan-Akademis.pdf | 1 | |
| 5. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Lembar-Pengesahan.pdf | 1 | |
| 6. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Pernyataan-Orisinalitas.pdf | 1 | |
| 7. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Formulir-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Karya-Ilmiah.pdf | 1 | |
| 8. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Bab-1.pdf | 7 | |
| 9. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Bab-2.pdf | 21 |
|
| 10. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Bab-3.pdf | 7 |
|
| 11. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Bab-4.pdf | 43 |
|
| 12. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Bab-5.pdf | 2 | |
| 13. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf | 7 | |
| 14. | 2025_TS_MTI_163012200001_Lampiran.pdf |
|
F Fasilitas pengolahan sampah plastik memiliki peranan untuk meningkatkan recycle rate pengolahan sampah sebesar 50%, guna mengurangi timbunan sampah di TPA (Tempat Pembuangan Akhir). Namun, ketersediaan lahan TPA untuk pengolahan sampah plastik sangat terbatas, sehingga perancangan tata letak berkelanjutan perlu dirancang dengan memperhatikan karakteristik dan batasan TPA di Indonesia. Berdasarkan permasalahan tersebut penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merancang tata letak berkelanjutan fasilitas pengolahan sampah plastik terintegrasi dengan pendekatan Sustainable Systematic Layout Planning (SSLP), dan pengambilan keputusan multi kriteria yaitu Eckenrode, dan Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realité (ELECTRE). Eckenrode digunakan untuk menganalisis tingkat kepentingan kriteria dan memilih kriteria yang digunakan dalam merancang tata letak berkelanjutan fasilitas pengolahan sampah plastik terintegrasi. SSLP digunakan untuk merancang alternatif tata letak berkelanjutan fasilitas pengolahan sampah plastik terintegrasi. ELECTRE digunakan untuk mengevaluasi alternatif tata letak berkelanjutan fasilitas pengolahan sampah plastik terintegrasi. Hasil analisis tingkat kepentingan kriteria dengan metode Eckenrode dan Judgement Expert menghasilkan tujuh kriteria, diantaranya: 1) Biaya, 2) Efisiensi Penggunaan Ruang, 3) Kesehatan dan Keselamatan, 4) Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Sekitar, 5) Efisiensi Penggunaan Air, 6) Efisiensi Energi, 7) Pengelolaan Limbah. Ketujuh kriteria tersebut menjadi dasar dalam perancangan tata letak berkelanjutan fasilitas pengolahan sampah plastik terintegrasi dengan menggunakan metode SSLP dan software VIP-PLANOPT. Hasilnya, diperoleh tiga alternatif tata letak. Alternatif 1 memiliki keunggulan yaitu luas area yang dibutuhkan lebih kecil dibandingkan alternatif 2 dan 3, serta area QC 1 berdekatan dengan area penerimaan. Alternatif 2 memiliki keunggulan yaitu area mobilitasnya yang lebih luas, area pemilahan dan gudang bahan baku dapat diperluas. Alternatif 3 memiliki keunggulan yaitu biaya perpindahan minim, area QC 1 berdekatan dengan area penerimaan dan area QC 3 berdekatan dengan area pengiriman, area proses produksi ditempatkan berdekatan, kemudahan aksesibilitas dan handling, serta kemudahan pemeliharaan. Berdasarkan hasil pendapat pakar bidang sustainable layout, pengolahan sampah plastik, dan perancangan mesin produksi, serta evaluasi dengan metode ELECTRE, alternatif 3 merupakan rancangan terbaik. Hasil rancangan diharapkan menjadi role model TPA di Indonesia, meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat dengan menciptakan peluang bisnis berbasis green economy, mengurangi jumlah sampah secara signifikan sehingga polusi lintas ekosistem berkurang, menciptakan gaya hidup berkelanjutan (green society), memanfaatkan keterbatasan lahan TPA, serta mendukung program Sustainable Development Goals (SDG’S) ketiga, keenam, ketujuh, kesembilan, kesebelas, keduabelas, dan ketigabelas.
P Plastic waste processing facilities play a crucial role in increasing the recycling rate of waste by 50%, thereby reducing the amount of waste in landfills. However, the availability of landfill land for plastic waste processing is minimal, so a sustainable layout design needs to be designed that considers the characteristics and limitations of landfills in Indonesia. Based on this problem, this study aims to design a sustainable layout for integrated plastic waste processing facilities using a Sustainable Systematic Layout Planning (SSLP) approach and multi-criteria decision-making, namely Eckenrode and Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realité (ELECTRE). Eckenrode is used to analyze the level of importance of criteria and select the criteria used in designing the sustainable layout of integrated plastic waste processing facilities. SSLP is used to design alternative sustainable layouts for integrated plastic waste processing facilities. ELECTRE is used to evaluate alternative sustainable layouts for integrated plastic waste processing facilities. The results of the analysis of the level of importance of criteria using the Eckenrode method and expert judgment produced seven criteria, including 1) Cost, 2) Space Utilization Efficiency, 3) Health and Safety, 4) Empowerment of the surrounding community, 5) Water Efficiency, 6) Electricity Efficiency, and 7) Waste Management. These seven criteria are the basis for designing the sustainable layout of integrated plastic waste processing facilities using the SSLP method and VIP-PLANOPT software. The results obtained three layout alternatives. Alternative 1 has the advantage of a smaller required area than alternatives 2 and 3, and the QC 1 area is adjacent to the receiving area. Alternative 2 has a wider mobility area, and the sorting area and raw material warehouse can be expanded. Alternative 3 has the advantages of minimal transfer costs, the QC 1 area is adjacent to the receiving area and the QC 3 area is adjacent to the shipping area, the production process area is located close together, with ease of accessibility and handling, and ease of maintenance. Based on the results of expert opinions in the field of sustainable layout, plastic waste processing, and production machine design, as well as evaluation using the ELECTRE method, alternative 3 is the best design. The results of the design are expected to become a role model for landfills in Indonesia, improve community welfare by creating business opportunities based on the green economy, significantly reduce the amount of waste so that cross-ecosystem pollution is reduced, create a sustainable lifestyle (green society), utilize limited landfill land, and support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) number three, six, seven, nine, eleven, twelve, and thirteen.