Perlawanan pihak ketiga terhadap sita eksekusi atas tanah sebagai jaminan hutang sebelum adanya putusan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap(studi putusan nomor 56/pdt/2021/pt.smr)
Info Katalog
File Repositori
Penerbit : FH - Usakti
Kota Terbit : Jakarta
Tahun Terbit : 2026
Pembimbing 1 : Ning Adiasih
Subyek : Civil procedure - Law and legislation
Kata Kunci : civil procedural law, third parties, and execution seizure
Status Posting : Published
Status : Lengkap
File Repositori
| No. | Nama File | Hal. | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Halaman-Judul.pdf | ||
| 2. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Surat-Pernyataan-Revisi-Terakhir.pdf | 1 | |
| 3. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Surat-Hasil-Similaritas.pdf | 1 | |
| 4. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Halaman-Pernyataan-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Tugas-Akhir-untuk-Kepentingan-Akademis.pdf | 1 | |
| 5. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Lembar-Pengesahan.pdf | 1 | |
| 6. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Pernyataan-Orisinalitas.pdf | 1 | |
| 7. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Formulir-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Karya-Ilmiah.pdf | 1 | |
| 8. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Bab-1.pdf | ||
| 9. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Bab-2.pdf |
|
|
| 10. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Bab-3.pdf |
|
|
| 11. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Bab-4.pdf |
|
|
| 12. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Bab-5.pdf | ||
| 13. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf | ||
| 14. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100400_Lampiran.pdf |
|
P Pelaksanaan sita eksekusi dalam perkara perdata pada dasarnya hanya boleh dilakukan terhadap putusan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (inkracht), namun praktik peradilan sering menemukan sita dan lelang eksekusi dilakukan sebelum proses upaya hukum selesai sepenuhnya, yang menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum terutama bagi pihak ketiga dengan kepentingan atas objek sengketa. penelitian ini berawal dari kasus perlawanan pihak ketiga (derden verzet) terhadap sita eksekusi tanah sebagai jaminan utang sebelum putusan inkracht, seperti dalam putusan nomor 56/pdt/2021/pt.smr dan putusan lanjutan, dengan rumusan masalah mencakup upaya hukum perlawanan pihak ketiga terhadap sita eksekusi berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan, dan akibat hukum terhadap objek sengketa yang telah dilelang berdasarkan putusan pengadilan yang kemudian dibatalkan mahkamah agung. metode penelitian bersifat hukum normatif, sifatnya deskriptif, menggunakan data sekunder seperti peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, dan bahan hukum relevan, dianalisis secara kualitatif. hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa perlawanan pihak ketiga adalah mekanisme yang sah untuk melindungi haknya yang dirugikan akibat peletakkan sita eksekusi yang melanggar asas kepastian hukum, sedangkan akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan dari adanya sita eksekusi dan lelang sebelum putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap berpotensi merugikan pihak ketiga beritikad baik, sehingga pengadilan wajib bertindak hati-hati dalam eksekusi untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak para pihak.
T The enforcement of execution seizure (sita eksekusi) in civil cases, in principle, may only be carried out against court decisions that have obtained permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). however, judicial practice frequently reveals that execution seizure and auction are conducted before all available legal remedies have been fully exhausted, resulting in legal uncertainty, particularly for third parties who have interests in the disputed object. this research originates from cases of third-party opposition (derden verzet) against the execution seizure of land used as debt collateral prior to the decision obtaining inkracht, as reflected in decision number 56/pdt/2021/pt.smr and subsequent rulings. the formulation of the research problems includes: the legal remedies available to third parties in opposing execution seizure based on prevailing laws and regulations, and the legal consequences for disputed objects that have been auctioned based on court decisions later annulled by the supreme court. this study employs a normative legal research method with a descriptive nature, utilizing secondary data such as statutory regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal materials, which are analyzed qualitatively. the findings conclude that third-party opposition constitutes a legitimate legal mechanism to protect the rights of parties harmed by the imposition of execution seizure that violates the principle of legal certainty. furthermore, the legal consequences arising from execution seizure and auction conducted prior to a decision obtaining permanent legal force have the potential to prejudice good-faith third parties; therefore, courts are required to exercise prudence in carrying out execution in order to ensure legal certainty and the protection of the parties’ rights
Info Koleksi Skripsi
Universitas
Fakultas
- FH (2154)
- FEB (7599)
- FK (2100)
- FKG (3980)
- FTSP (1163)
- FTI (3966)
- FTKE (2589)
- FALTL (1955)
- FSRD (791)