T The era of globalization accelerates the advancement of the times, causing technology to have both positive and negative impacts, including the spread of electronic documents containing moral elements. this case began with the perpetrator recording and disseminating a video of immoral acts performed by a friend, which was classified by the judge under article 4 paragraph (1) letter d of law no. 44 of 2008. the study is based on decision no. xx/pid.sus/2021/pn tmt, with the issue being whether the elements of disseminating electronic documents containing moral content meet the qualifications of article 4 paragraph (1) letter d of law no. 44 of 2008 concerning pornography, and how the perpetrator\\\'s involvement in the crime is characterized. this research uses a normative method with a descriptive approach through literature study and is analyzed qualitatively with a deductive approach. the conclusion is that the act of disseminating electronic documents containing moral content does not meet the qualifications of article 4 paragraph (1) of the pornography law. this indicates that the principle of legality and the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali have not been applied, and the form of the perpetrator\\\'s involvement falls under participation due to the awareness and division of roles in the commission of the crime. the research results indicate that the elements of the crime of disseminating electronic documents containing moral content should be based on article 27 paragraph (1) of the ite law in conjunction with article 55 paragraph (1) of the criminal code.