S Suspension of debt payment obligation is a legal instrument that allows a debtor to prepare a settlement agreement as an alternative to bankruptcy. in the case of pt. jatim bromo steel, the court rejected the homologation of the settlement agreement due to the absence of an agreement on the administrators’ remuneration. this study uses the court ruling number 2/pdt.sus-pkpu/2023/pn.niaga.sby, focusing on the following main issues: (1) whether the granting of privileged rights to administrators in article 234 paragraph (5) of law number 37 of 2004 on bankruptcy and suspension of debt payment obligation has or has not been sufficient to guarantee the certainty of payment of administrators\\\' fees that must be prioritized; and (2) what legal consequences arise from the rejection of the homologation of the settlement agreement in the pkpu process of pt. jatim bromo steel for the parties involved.the research method used is normative legal research and is descriptive-analytical in nature. the data were obtained using secondary sources and analyzed qualitatively. the conclusions of this study are: (1) that law number 37 of 2004 concerning bankruptcy and suspension of debt payment obligation does not sufficiently guarantee legal certainty over the payment of administrators’ fees, even though privileged rights are granted under article 234 paragraph (5); and (2) the rejection of the homologation has serious implications: for the debtor, it results in bankruptcy; for the creditors, it nullifies the agreed payment scheme; and for the administrators, it creates uncertainty over remuneration that has not yet been agreed upon.