Analisis yuridis penjatuhan sanksi terhadap dokter yang melakukan pelanggaran disiplin (studi kasus dr, piprim basarah yanuarso, sp.a, subsp (k)
Penerbit : FH - Usakti
Kota Terbit : Jakarta
Tahun Terbit : 2026
Pembimbing 1 : Yogo Pamungkas
Kata Kunci : Civil Servant Doctors, Employee Discipline, Medical Ethics, Employment Disputes, Administrative Law.
Status Posting : Published
Status : Lengkap
| No. | Nama File | Hal. | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Halaman-Judul.pdf | 8 | |
| 2. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Surat-Pernyataan-Revisi-Terakhir.pdf | 1 | |
| 3. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Surat-Hasil-Similaritas.pdf | 1 | |
| 4. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Halaman-Pernyataan-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Tugas-Akhir-untuk-Kepentingan-Akademis.pdf | 1 | |
| 5. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Lembar-Pengesahan.pdf | 1 | |
| 6. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Pernyataan-Orisinalitas.pdf | 1 | |
| 7. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Formulir-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Karya-Ilmiah.pdf | 1 | |
| 8. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Bab-1.pdf | 14 | |
| 9. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Bab-2.pdf | 13 |
|
| 10. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Bab-3.pdf | 24 |
|
| 11. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Bab-4.pdf | 21 |
|
| 12. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Bab-5.pdf | 4 | |
| 13. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf | 4 | |
| 14. | 2026_SK_SHK_010001900539_Lampiran.pdf | 1 |
|
P Penelitian ini menganalisis konflik norma penegakan hukum terhadap tenaga medis berstatus aparatur sipil negara (asn), yang tunduk pada hukum kesehatan sekaligus hukum administrasi negara. studi ini mengangkat kasus pemberhentian dr. piprim basarah yanuarso, sp.a(k), ketua idai, oleh kementerian kesehatan setelah bersikap kritis menolak unifikasi kolegium di bawah uu no. 17 tahun 2023 tentang kesehatan dan menolak mutasi sepihak. rumusan masalah berfokus pada apakah tindakan dr. piprim melanggar disiplin asn atau kode etika, serta kesesuaian sanksi pemberhentian tersebut dengan ketentuan hukum. metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. data sekunder dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan penarikan kesimpulan deduktif. hasil penelitian menunjukkan tindakan dr. piprim yang tetap memberikan pelayanan medis di instansi asalnya (rscm) tidak melanggar disiplin administratif murni maupun etika kedokteran. kebijakan mutasi sepihak kemenkes dinilai cacat prosedur karena tidak berbasis sistem merit. sanksi pemberhentian dengan hormat tidak atas permintaan sendiri melanggar asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik (aupb), khususnya asas kecermatan dan proporsionalitas, serta mengabaikan otonomi profesi dan due process of law. disimpulkan bahwa sanksi tersebut tidak sah, sehingga hakim ptun seyogianya membatalkan keputusan pemberhentian tersebut demi kepastian hukum.
T This study analyzes the conflict of norms regarding law enforcement against medical personnel holding state civil apparatus (asn) status, who are subject to both health law and state administrative law. the study examines the case of the dismissal of dr. piprim basarah yanuarso, sp.a(k)—chairman of the indonesian pediatric society (idai)—by the ministry of health following his critical stance against the unification of medical colleges under law no. 17 of 2023 concerning health and his refusal of a unilateral transfer. the research problem focuses on whether dr. piprim’s actions violated asn disciplinary rules or the code of ethics, as well as the legal conformity of the dismissal sanction. a normative-juridical method was employed, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. secondary data were analyzed qualitatively using deductive reasoning. the findings indicate that dr. piprim’s continued provision of medical services at his home institution (rscm) violated neither administrative disciplinary rules nor medical ethics. the ministry of health’s unilateral transfer policy is deemed procedurally flawed as it was not based on a merit system. the sanction of honorable dismissal (not at the individual\'s own request) violated the general principles of good governance (aupb)—specifically the principles of prudence and proportionality—while disregarding professional autonomy and due process of law. it is concluded that the sanction is invalid; therefore, the administrative court judge should annul the dismissal decision to ensure legal certainty.