L Law number 18 of 2017 concerning the protection of indonesian migrant workers regulates the prohibition regarding the placement of indonesian migrant workers who do not meet the requirements. however, in practice, placements are still found to be carried out without fulfilling the requirements or procedures. such as in the case of the unprocedural placement carried out by manap against victim erisah in decision number 66/pid.sus/2021/pn sng. therefore, the problem is whether manap in this case has met the qualifications to place pmi and what requirements and procedures were not met in their actions in placing victim erisah to work abroad. to answer this problem, a normative study was conducted on decision number 66/pid.sus/2021/pn sng and the underlying laws and regulations. the results of the study indicate that the implementation of the placement of indonesian migrant workers may only be carried out by bp2mi, p3mi and bumn/bumd companies or non-p3mi private companies for the company\\\'s own needs. in addition, the procedures that were not fulfilled included not carrying out the registration procedures, health checks, placement agreements and work agreements as well as passport processing and not fulfilling the requirements of having competence, being physically and mentally healthy, being registered and having a social security participant number and having the complete required documents.