E Electronic court proceedings represent a form of modernization in civil procedural law aimed at enhancing judicial efficiency and accessibility. in indonesia, the regulation of electronic proceedings is governed by supreme court regulations, particularly supreme court regulation (perma) number 1 of 2019 as amended by perma number 7 of 2022. however, in practice, their implementation continues to face challenges, especially in terms of legal certainty and practical enforcement. in contrast, germany regulates electronic court proceedings in a more comprehensive manner through section 128a of the zivilprozessordnung (zpo) and other supporting regulations that have the status of statutory law. this study employs a normative legal research method using a descriptive-comparative approach, with conclusions drawn deductively. the research addresses the following questions: how are electronic court proceedings regulated within civil procedural law in indonesia and germany? what are the strengths and weaknesses of the regulation of electronic court proceedings in indonesian civil procedure law compared to that of germany? the findings indicate that the regulation of electronic court proceedings in indonesia remains partial and is heavily dependent on internal regulations of the supreme court, thereby potentially giving rise to legal uncertainty. meanwhile, germany has systematically integrated electronic court proceedings into its civil procedural law, supported by more clearly defined legal mechanisms and infrastructure.