T The case of erick thohir holding concurrent positions as minister of state-owned enterprises (soes) while simultaneously serving as a member of the supervisory board of danantara gives rise to legal issues and conflicts of interest, as well as questions regarding the applicable legal basis and the legal approach used to assess the legality of such actions. this study focuses on two main issues, namely: (1) whether holding concurrent positions as minister of soes and member of the supervisory board of danantara is in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations; and (2) what the legal implications are of holding concurrent positions as minister of soes and member of the supervisory board of danantara. the research method employed is normative legal research through an examination of law number 39 of 2008 on state ministries, law number 1 of 2025 on danantara, law number 30 of 2014 on government administration, constitutional court decisions, and constitutional law literature. the analysis is conducted qualitatively using deductive reasoning in drawing conclusions. the findings indicate that the prohibition of concurrent positions for the minister of soes is expressly regulated in article 23 of law no. 39/2008, article 56b of law no. 1/2025, and constitutional court decision no. 128/puu-xxiii/2025. the implications of holding such concurrent positions are that it is contrary to the law, undermines the principle of checks and balances, and results in the failure to uphold the principles of good governance.