T This thesis examines israel\\\'s attack on april 1, 2024, targeting the iranian consulate in damascus, syria, which resulted in the deaths of several high-ranking officials. the incident drew significant international attention as it was viewed as a violation of the principle of inviolability. this raises questions about how israel breached the 1961 and 1963 vienna conventions, as well as the 1973 convention, and what the legal consequences are for israel\\\'s airstrike on diplomatic relations between iran, israel, and syria. this study utilizes a normative research approach, is descriptive in nature, and is based on secondary data from international conventions, un documents, and academic journals. it employs qualitative analysis methods using deductive reasoning. despite israel having signed all three international conventions, violations of the principle of inviolability continue to occur without israel taking responsibility toward iran. iran and syria may pursue a lawsuit against israel in the international court of justice for the damages resulting from the attacks. the conclusion of the first problem statement addresses the violations of the principle of inviolability under the 1961 vienna convention, the attack on the consular building under the 1963 vienna convention, and the 1973 convention regarding the assassination of two senior iranian leaders and eight officers of the iranian revolutionary guard corps (irgc). additionally, it highlights the legal consequences that israel must face through international dispute resolution mechanisms, such as the international court of justice or the united nations security council.