T The granting of a mortgage may be carried out by anindividual or a legal entity; such granting must beperformed by a party authorized to performlegal acts regarding the subject matter; however, in practice,the granting of a mortgage is not always carried out in accordance withapplicable legal provisions. the research questions inthis study are: how is the granting of a mortgage by a third partycarried out under the mortgage law, and what are theconsequences of such a grant based ondistrict court decision no. 476/pdt.g/2023/pn cbi. toaddress these issues, a descriptive normative study was conducted,utilizing primary data obtained throughinterviews with a notary public (ppat) as supporting evidence,as well as secondary data sourced from primary andsecondary legal materials through a literature review. the data were analyzedqualitatively, with conclusions drawn using deductive logic.the research findings indicate that the granting of a mortgage right by a third partymust be carried out by an authorized party in accordance with article 8of the mortgage law. in judgment no. 476/pdt.g/2023/pn cbi, the grantingof a mortgage right conducted without the presence of the landownerdoes not comply with the provisions of article 8 of the mortgage law, therefore, pursuant toarticle 1320 in conjunction with article 1335 of the civil code, the deed of grant of a mortgageand the mortgage certificate resulting fromsaid encumbrance are declared null and void as a matter of law due to thefailure to satisfy the objective requirements of the agreement.