T The suspension of debt payment obligations (penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang/pkpu) is a legal mechanism within the indonesian bankruptcy system that aims to provide debtors with an opportunity to restructure their debt obligations in order to avoid bankruptcy and to maintain business continuity. article 222 paragraph (1) of law number 37 of 2004 on bankruptcy and the suspension of debt payment obligations does not regulate a minimum claim value as a requirement for filing a pkpu application. nevertheless, in commercial court practice, there are court decisions that reject pkpu applications on the grounds that the claim value is relatively small, even though the formal requirements stipulated by law have been fulfilled. in addition, in such cases, other creditors were present and examined during the court proceedings, yet the value of their claims was not included in the judges’ legal considerations.this study examines the legal basis of judges’ considerations in rejecting pkpu applications based on small claim values, as well as the procedural process of the participation of other creditors and its implications under civil procedural law. this research employs a normative legal research method with a descriptive-analytical approach. the data used consist of secondary data obtained through library research, including legislation, court decisions, and legal literature. the analysis is conducted qualitatively, and conclusions are drawn deductively.the findings indicate that judges have the authority to assess the substantive feasibility of pkpu applications, as regulated in article 178 paragraph (1) of the herziene indonesisch reglement (hir). however, the omission of facts revealed during the proceedings, particularly regarding the claim values of other creditors, may lead to incomplete legal reasoning. therefore, this study recommends the need for clear regulation concerning a minimum claim value in pkpu proceedings to prevent multiple interpretations and to promote consistency in commercial court practice.