T This study is motivated by the continuing issues surrounding the implementation of concert ticket refunds in indonesia, despite the fact that consumers\\\' refund rights have been regulated under existing laws and regulations, a situation that differs from that in south korea. the issues examined in this study are: how are the similarities and differences in the regulation of concert ticket refund mechanisms in indonesia and south korea, and how are consumers\\\' rights to compensation of refunds implemented through the case studies of the day6 concert in indonesia and the sarah chang & virtuosi concert in south korea? this research is normative legal research employing the statutory approach and the comparative approach. it is descriptive-analytical in nature and uses secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research, which are then analyzed qualitatively using the deductive method. the results of the analysis indicate that both indonesia and south korea provide legal protection regarding refunds in the form of compensation when business actors fail to fulfill their obligations. the differences lies in the regulatory framework, where refund rights in indonesia remain general in nature and are dispersed across several legal instruments, whereas south korea has established a more integrated system through the framework act on consumers and the consumer dispute resolution standards, which provide more detailed refund guidelines and ensure legal certainty. the implementation of consumers\\\' refund rights in the day6 concert case in indonesia demonstrates that the fulfillment og consumers\\\' rights has not yet been carried out effectively. in contrast, the sarah chang & virtuosi concert case in south korea resulted in the resolution of the dispute through the provision of refunds in accordance with the applivcable laws and regulations of south korea.