Perlindungan hukum terhadap kerahasiaanidentitas anak dalam perkara pidana anak(analisis putusan nomor 14/pid.sus-anak/2022/pn cbn.)
Penerbit : FH - Usakti
Kota Terbit : Jakarta
Tahun Terbit : 2026
Pembimbing 1 : Dwi Alfianto
Kata Kunci : LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF A CHILD\\\'S IDENTITY IN JUVENILE CRIMINAL CASES (ANALYSI
Status Posting : Published
Status : Lengkap
| No. | Nama File | Hal. | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Halaman-Judul.pdf | ||
| 2. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Surat-Pernyataan-Revisi-Terakhir.pdf | 1 | |
| 3. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Surat-Hasil-Similaritas.pdf | 1 | |
| 4. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Halaman-Pernyataan-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Tugas-Akhir-untuk-Kepentingan-Akademis.pdf | 1 | |
| 5. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Lembar-Pengesahan.pdf | 1 | |
| 6. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Pernyataan-Orisinalitas.pdf | 1 | |
| 7. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Formulir-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Karya-Ilmiah.pdf | 1 | |
| 8. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Bab-1.pdf | ||
| 9. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Bab-2.pdf |
|
|
| 10. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Bab-3.pdf |
|
|
| 11. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Bab-4.pdf |
|
|
| 12. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Bab-5.pdf | ||
| 13. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf | ||
| 14. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002200392_Lampiran.pdf |
|
P Putusan nomor 14/pid.sus-anak/2022/pn cbn merupakan perkara pidanaanak mengenai tindak pidana membawa senjata tajam yang dalamputusannya masih mencantumkan identitas anak secara lengkap.pencantuman identitas tersebut menimbulkan permasalahan karenabertentangan dengan ketentuan mengenai kerahasiaan identitas anak dalamsistem peradilan pidana anak. adapun rumusan masalah penelitian iniadalah bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap anak yang berhadapandengan hukum dalam hal kerahasiaan identitas anak, anak korban, dan anaksaksi dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak, serta apakah putusan nomor14/pid.sus-anak/2022/pn cbn telah memberikan perlindungan hukumterhadap kerahasiaan identitas anak dan bagaimana akibat hukumnya.penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptifanalitis, menggunakan data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui studikepustakaan, dianalisis secara kualitatif, dan ditarik kesimpulan denganmetode deduktif. kesimpulan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindunganhukum terhadap kerahasiaan identitas anak telah diatur dalam undang-undang nomor 11 tahun 2012 tentang sistem peradilan pidana anak danundang-undang nomor 35 tahun 2014 tentang perlindungan anak sebagaibentuk perlindungan khusus bagi anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum.namun, putusan nomor 14/pid.sus-anak/2022/pn cbn belum menerapkanketentuan tersebut karena masih mencantumkan identitas anak secaralengkap sehingga tidak memberikan perlindungan hukum secara optimal,berpotensi menimbulkan pelanggaran hak anak, stigma, diskriminasi, sertatidak mencerminkan prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak.
C Court decision number 14/pid.sus-anak/2022/pn cbn concerns a juvenile criminal case involving the carrying of a sharp weapon, wherein the ruling explicitly includes the child\\\'s full identity. this inclusion creates an issue as it contravenes regulations regarding the confidentiality of a child\\\'s identity within the juvenile criminal justice system. the research addresses the following questions: how legal protection is afforded to children in conflict with the law regarding the confidentiality of the identities of the child (offender), child victims, and child witnesses within the juvenile criminal justice system; and whether court decision number 14/pid.sus-anak/2022/pn cbn has provided legal protection for the child\\\'s identity confidentiality and what the legal consequences are. this study employs normative legal research with a descriptive-analytical approach, utilizing secondary data gathered through literature review, analyzed qualitatively, and concluded via the deductive method. the research concludes that legal protection regarding the confidentiality of a child\\\'s identity is mandated by law number 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile criminal justice system and law number 35 of 2014 concerning child protection as a form of special protection for children in conflict with the law. however, court decision number 14/pid.sus-anak/2022/pn cbn failed to implement these provisions by including the child\\\'s full identity; consequently, it did not provide optimal legal protection, created the potential for violations of children\\\'s rights, stigma, and discrimination, and failed to reflect the principle of the best interests of the child.