I Indonesia’s kitap (permanent stay permit card) and the united states’ green card both represent permanent residency statuses for foreign nationals. this study uses a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical nature. the research problems addressed are: what are the similarities and differences between the procedures for obtaining a kitap in indonesia and a green card in the united states, and what are the implications of holding these documents for the rights and obligations of foreign nationals. the research methodology relies on secondary data supported by primary data from interviews. the data were analyzed qualitatively, with conclusions drawn deductively. the findings show that kitap and green card share similarities in the philosophy of selective systems, sponsorship requirements, permanent legal status with a path to naturalization, and special administrative treatment. the differences lie in eligibility prerequisites, access pathways, processing duration, technical security requirements, and investment costs. the implications of ownership include access to property ownership, healthcare and social services, international mobility, and opportunities for naturalization. the study concludes that while kitap and green card serve similar purposes as permanent residency documents, their implementation and implications differ according to each country’s legal system and immigration policies.