T The main issue examined is the interpretation of the competitive neutrality principle from the perspective of indonesian competition law, together with its application in kppu decision no. 08/kppu-i/2020 (the blocking of netflix by telkom group) and decision no. 03/kppu-i/2024 (the google play billing practice). this study employs normative juridical research of a descriptive-analytical nature, using secondary data analyzed qualitatively with deductive reasoning. the findings conclude that the principle of competitive neutrality is implicitly embedded in law no. 5 of 1999 and can be operationalized as an interpretive principle through a systematic interpretation of articles 2, 3, 17, 19, and 25, resting on four core elements: level playing field, no undue advantage, equal access, and transparency. its application, however, has been inconsistent: google was found guilty and sanctioned, whereas telkom group, as a state-owned enterprise (bumn), was assessed under a more lenient standard and declared not proven to have committed a violation, even though the element of discrimination was acknowledged. this asymmetry risks undermining legal certainty and competitive fairness in indonesia\\\'s digital market.