T This study examines the legal framework governing halal food labeling in indonesia and pakistan, as well as its implementation in resolving cases involving violations. the research focuses on the legal regulations concerning halal food labeling and the implementation and effectiveness of these regulations in addressing related violations. the objectives of this study are to analyze the legal framework for halal food labeling in both countries, examine the similarities, differences, strengths, and weaknesses of their respective systems, and identify aspects that may serve as references for indonesia in improving the effectiveness of supervision and law enforcement. this research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative law approaches with a descriptive-analytical nature. secondary data were analyzed qualitatively using a deductive method of drawing conclusions. the findings indicate that indonesia has established a comprehensive legal framework through law no. 33 of 2014 on halal product assurance and its implementing regulations. however, its implementation involves multiple institutions, making supervision and law enforcement more complex. in contrast, pakistan adopts a centralized system through the pakistan halal authority, which is authorized to regulate, supervise, and enforce halal-related laws, resulting in a faster and more effective resolution of violations. this study concludes that the primary difference between the two countries lies in their institutional structure and law enforcement mechanisms. pakistan\\\'s integrated and centralized system may serve as a valuable reference for indonesia in enhancing the effectiveness of supervision, institutional coordination, and law enforcement concerning violations of halal labeling regulations.