H Human trafficking is a serious crime that has significant physical, psychological, and economic impacts on its victims. in indonesia, the crime is regulated under law number 21 of 2007 concerning the eradication of the criminal act of human trafficking and supreme court regulation (perma) number 1 of 2022, which aims to ensure the fulfillment of victims\\\' right to restitution throughout every stage of the criminal justice process. in practice, however, the awarding of restitution is frequently overlooked, as reflected in district court decision number 555/pid.sus/2023/pn.stb in conjunction with supreme court cassation decision number 7283 k/pid.sus/2024, in which the restitution claim submitted by the public prosecutor was omitted from the operative part of the judgment despite the defendant being found guilty. this study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the right of victims of human trafficking to restitution under the applicable laws and regulations, as well as to examine the implementation of that right in the aforementioned judicial decisions. this research employs a normative legal research method based on library research with a descriptive-analytical approach. the primary legal materials consist of statutory regulations and court decisions, while the secondary legal materials include books, academic journals, and scholarly articles. the findings indicate that the normative framework governing victims\\\' right to restitution is adequately established; however, its implementation remains weak. supreme court cassation decision number 7283 k/pid.sus/2024 is considered inconsistent with article 48 of law number 21 of 2007 because it failed to include an order for restitution, thereby undermining the victims\\\' right to recovery and potentially creating an unfavorable legal precedent. therefore, the criminal justice system should apply the statutory provisions on restitution more consistently and strengthen the evaluation of law enforcement authorities in safeguarding victims\\\' rights.