T The actions of the perpetrator who used false dignity to commit fraud on others and after the money was received. then the goods are not given, decided by article 372 of the criminal code study decision number 469/pid.b/2021/pn jkt pst. the problem formulations in this thesis are (1) whether or not the defendant\\\'s actions can be categorized as embezzlement based on article 372 of the criminal code (2) what is the basis for the judge to decide based on article 372 of the criminal code. the research method used in this thesis is normative with a literature study, descriptive analytical in nature, secondary data sources and primary data to strengthen secondary data, analysis with a qualitative approach and deductive conclusions. conclusion (1) the defendant\\\'s actions cannot be categorized as article 372 of the criminal code. (2) the judge\\\'s basis for deciding based on article 372 of the criminal code is that the defendant ran away after the money was already in his hands and agreed to send the mask. the result of this study is that the actions of the perpetrator should be based on article 378 jo article 372 of the criminal code because the perpetrator committed fraud after receiving the money, the perpetrator took away the money and did not provide the goods ordered by the victim.