S Sexual violence in indonesia continues to rise, with significant impacts on victims, particularly women, children, and persons with disabilities. these cases range from harassment to rape and often occur in both private and public settings. in response, the indonesian government enacted law number 12 of 2022 on the crime of sexual violence as an effort to protect victims. in addition to criminal punishment, restitution is also a right of victims to recover from physical, mental, and economic losses. however, in judicial practice, the granting of restitution still faces obstacles, as reflected in decision no. 805/pid.sus/2023/pn.tjk, where the request for restitution for a child victim with a disability was denied, despite the perpetrator having committed a serious crime.this study analyzes the denial of restitution in the aforementioned case, aiming to highlight the importance of upholding victims’ rights and holding perpetrators accountable, as well as to encourage improvements in the application of restitution within indonesia’s legal system. the study uses a normative legal approach, focusing on library research. the type of research employed is normative legal research, which examines law as a system of norms through the analysis of legal materials. this research is descriptive-analytical in nature, illustrating the legal implications of granting restitution to victims of sexual violence.the data used includes primary data obtained directly from the source and secondary data sourced from books, journals, and legal documents. primary legal materials used include laws, the criminal procedure code, and decision no. 805/pid.sus/2023/pn.tjk.the conclusion of this study indicates that in decision no. 805/pid.sus/2023/pn.tjk, although the defendant was proven to have committed sexual violence, the request for restitution was denied due to a lack of evidence supporting the claim of losses, even though the prosecutor had presented strong evidence. according to the law on the crime of sexual violence, victims are entitled to restitution, including both material and immaterial damages such as psychological trauma. this denial reflects a discrepancy in the implementation of the sexual violence law. restitution must cover both aspects, and the justice system needs to pay greater attention to psychological evidence and strengthen the role of institutions such as the witness and victim protection agency (lpsk) in supporting the evidence process and the recovery of victims.