Implikasi hukum putusan mahkamah agung nomor 23 p/hum/2024 pasca terbitnya putusan mahkamah konstitusi nomor 70/puu-xxii/2024
Penerbit : FH - Usakti
Kota Terbit : Jakarta
Tahun Terbit : 2025
Pembimbing 1 : Muhammad Imam Nasef
Kata Kunci : Judicial Review, Supreme Court, dan Constitutional Court
Status Posting : Published
Status : Lengkap
No. | Nama File | Hal. | Link |
---|---|---|---|
1. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Halaman-Judul.pdf | 9 | |
2. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Surat-Pernyataan-Revisi-Terakhir.pdf | 1 | |
3. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Surat-Hasil-Similaritas.pdf | 1 | |
4. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Halaman-Pernyataan-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Tugas-Akhir-untuk-Kepentingan-Akademis.pdf | 1 | |
5. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Lembar-Pengesahan.pdf | 1 | |
6. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Pernyataan-Orisinalitas.pdf | ||
7. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Formulir-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Karya-Ilmiah.pdf | ||
8. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Bab-1.pdf | 22 | |
9. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Bab-2.pdf | 43 |
|
10. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Bab-3.pdf | 27 |
|
11. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Bab-4.pdf | 27 |
|
12. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Bab-5.pdf | 4 | |
13. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf | 4 | |
14. | 2025_SK_SHK_010002100227_Lampiran.pdf | 123 |
|
P Penelitian ini membahas perbedaan pertimbangan hukum antara putusan ma no. 23 p/hum/2024 dan putusan mk no. 70/puu-xxii/2024 dalam menentukan batas usia minimal calon kepala daerah. pokok permasalahan terletak pada tafsir waktu pemenuhan syarat usia yang saling bertentangan: ma menilai usia dihitung sejak pelantikan, sedangkan mk menegaskan usia dihitung sejak penetapan pasangan calon. penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum masing-masing putusan serta implikasi hukumnya terhadap penyelenggaraan pilkada dan konsistensi sistem hukum nasional. metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, bersifat deksriptif. data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan, dianalisis secara kualitatif, dan pengambilan kesimpulan dilakukan secara deduktif. hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan ma melampaui kewenangannya dengan menafsirkan norma dalam undang-undang, yang merupakan ranah mk. putusan mk justru menegaskan kepastian hukum sesuai pasal 28d a(1) uudnri/1945. perbedaan tafsir ini menciptakan dualisme tafsir hukum, yang menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum bagi penyelenggara pemilu dan para calon kepala daerah. berdasarkan stufenbau theory, norma hasil tafsir mk harus di prioritaskan karena berada dalam hierarki hukum yang lebih tinggi. penelitian ini menyarankan reformasi sistem judicial review menuju satu atap di mahkamah konstitusi.
T This study discusses the differences in legal considerations between supreme court decision no. 23 p/hum/2024 and constitutional court decision no. 70/puu-xxii/2024 in determining the minimum age limit for regional head candidates. the core issue lies in the conflicting interpretations of the timing for fulfilling the age requirement: the supreme court considers the age to be calculated from the date of inauguration, while the constitutional court emphasizes that the age should be calculated from the date of the designation of the candidate pair. this study aims to analyze the legal considerations of each decision and their legal implications for the conduct of regional elections and the consistency of the national legal system. the research method used is normative legal research with a legislative and conceptual approach, which is descriptive in nature. the data used are secondary data obtained through literature review, analyzed qualitatively, and conclusions are drawn deductively. the results of the study indicate that the supreme court\\\'s decision exceeded its authority by interpreting norms in the law, which is the domain of the constitutional court. the constitutional court\\\'s decision, on the other hand, affirmed legal certainty in accordance with article 28d a(1) of the 1945 constitution of the republic of indonesia. this difference in interpretation created a dualism of legal interpretation, which caused legal uncertainty for election organizers and regional head candidates. based on the stufenbau theory, the norms resulting from the constitutional court\\\'s interpretation should be prioritized because they are in a higher legal hierarchy. this study suggests reforming the judicial review system into a single entity under the constitutional court.