T The homologation of the pkpu composition plan by the commercial court does not necessarily facilitate the debtor in implementing the content of the composition plan, as it allows for events beyond control such as the covid-19 pandemic which requires the debtor to be unable to fulfill its obligations and ends in the cancellation of the composition by the creditor resulting in the debtor becoming bankrupt. the issues are whether covid-19 as force majeure can be submitted by a composition plan that does not regulate force majeure and has been homologated and whether the judge\'s considerations in decision number 23/pdt.sus-pembatalan perdamaian/2024/pn.niaga.jkt.pst are in accordance with article 291 paragraph (1) of law no. 37/2004. to answer these issues, a normative research with a descriptive nature was conducted. the conclusions of the research are 1) covid-19 can be the basis for the application of the force majeure doctrine to cancel the cancellation of the composition plan submitted by pt bank pdksp even though the pkpu composition plan does not regulate the force majeure clause, because article 1244 and article 1245 of the civil code remain applicable based on the integration principle and article 299 of law no. 37/2004. 2) decision number 23/pdt.sus-pembatalan perdamaian/2024/pn.niaga.jkt.pst is not in accordance with article 291 paragraph (1) jo. article 170 paragraph (2) of law no. 37/2004 because the judge did not consider the condition of pt asp whose financial condition had not fully recovered due to the impact of covid-19 as force majeure.