Analisa perbandingan pengaturan judi online di indonesia dan singapore
Penerbit : FH - Usakti
Kota Terbit : Jakarta
Tahun Terbit : 2026
Pembimbing 1 : Vientje Ratna M
Kata Kunci : Online Gambling, Comparative Law, Indonesian Legal System, Singapore Legal System, Remote Gambling A
Status Posting : Published
Status : Lengkap
| No. | Nama File | Hal. | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Halaman-Judul.pdf | ||
| 2. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Surat-Pernyataan-Revisi-Terakhir.pdf | 1 | |
| 3. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Surat-Hasil-Similaritas.pdf | 1 | |
| 4. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Halaman-Pernyataan-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Tugas-Akhir-untuk-Kepentingan-Akademis.pdf | 1 | |
| 5. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Lembar-Pengesahan.pdf | 1 | |
| 6. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Pernyataan-Orisinalitas.pdf | 1 | |
| 7. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Formulir-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Karya-Ilmiah.pdf | 1 | |
| 8. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Bab-1.pdf | ||
| 9. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Bab-2.pdf |
|
|
| 10. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Bab-3.pdf |
|
|
| 11. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Bab-4.pdf |
|
|
| 12. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Bab-5.pdf | ||
| 13. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf | ||
| 14. | 2026_SK_SHK_010002100287_Lampiran.pdf |
|
M Masalah judi online marak terjadi tidak hanya di indonesia tapi juga di beberapa negara termasuk singapura. hanya saja pengaturan dan sanksinya berbeda antara indonesia dengan yang berlaku di singapura. permasalahan yang diangkat adalah bagaimana sistem hukum judi online di indonesia dan singapura, serta bagaimana perbedaan pengaturan judi online di indonesia dan singapura. menjawab rumusan masalah, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yang berbasis pada data sekunder dengan sifat penelitian deskriptif-analitis dan penarikan kesimpulannya menggunakan logika deduktif. kesimpulan penelitian diketahui sistem hukum pengaturan judi online indonesia menganut civil law sytem sedangkan singapore menganut common law system membuat pengaturan judi online di indonesia menganut larangan total melalui kuhp dan uu ite, sementara singapura mengatur dengan pendekatan terkontrol melalui remote gambling act 2014 yang memungkinkan pengecualian terbatas. perbedaan pengaturan judi onlinen perbedaan terhadap asas hukum yang mendasarinya. indonesia berfokus pada asas kepastian hukum, moralitas, dan pendekatan larangan total melalui kuhp dan uu ite. sementara itu, singapura menekankan efektivitas hukum, proporsionalitas, dan pengendalian risiko sosial melalui regulasi khusus remote gambling act 2014. hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa indonesia, sebagai negara civil law, menganut pendekatan berdasarkan larangan total dalam kuhp dan uu ite,. sebaliknya, singapura yang berbasis sistem common law melakukan pendekatan regulatif-terkontrol melalui regulasi khusus judi online yaitu remote gambling act 2014.
O Online gambling is rampant not only in indonesia but also in several countries, including singapore. however, regulations and sanctions differ between indonesia and singapore. the problem raised is the legal system of online gambling in indonesia and singapore, and the differences in online gambling regulations in indonesia and singapore. to answer the problem formulation, the author used a normative research method based on secondary data with a descriptive-analytical nature and deductive logic in drawing conclusions. the research concluded that the legal system for regulating online gambling in indonesia adheres to the civil law system, while singapore adheres to the common law system. online gambling regulations in indonesia adhere to a total prohibition through the criminal code and the ite law, while singapore regulates with a controlled approach through the remote gambling act 2014, which allows for limited exceptions. the differences in online gambling regulations are based on differences in the underlying legal principles. indonesia focuses on the principles of legal certainty, morality, and a total prohibition approach through the criminal code and the ite law. meanwhile, singapore emphasizes legal effectiveness, proportionality, and social risk control through its special regulation, the remote gambling act 2014. the research results show that indonesia, as a civil law country, adopts an approach based on a total prohibition in the criminal code and the ite law. in contrast, singapore, which is based on a common law system, adopts a regulatory-controlled approach through its special regulation on online gambling, the remote gambling act 2014.