C Constitutional court decision number 112/puu-xx/2022 sparked controversy because the constitutional court added the phrase \\\"or has experience as kpk leadership\\\" to the age requirements for kpk leadership candidates and extended the term of office from 4 years to 5 years. the constitutional court\\\'s action are considered to have exceeded its authority as an negative legislator and violated the principle of open legal policy. the problems that arise are how the legal consequences of constitutional court decision number 112/puu-xx/2022, which is deemed to have exceeded its authority (ultra vires) and contradicted the principle of open legal policy, and whether the decision is in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations. this research uses a normative legal research type combined with an empirical approach through interviews with constitutional law lecturers. the nature of the research is descriptive-analytical and draws conclusions using a deductive method. based on the research findings and conclusions, the constitutional court has acted beyond its funcion as a negative legislator by creating new norms that should be the authority of the house of representatives and the president. the legal consequences include the formation of new norms by the constitutional court (judicial law-making), violation of the prospective principle. inconsistent application of the open legal policy principle, and the absence of a checks and balances mechanism over constitutional court decisions. this decision does not comply with article 73 paragraph (1c) of constitutional court regulation number 2 of 2021 and constitutional provisions that limit the constitutional court\\\'s authority in judicial review.